What are the political implications of Buddhism? In an age where politics is such a big part of our lives, and there are so many issues that cause pain and suffering, should we be active and engaged in the political process? Or would this put us in danger of us vs. them divisive thinking? When some actively want to harm others, are we obligated to try and stop them?
The political position of Buddhism has always been to get along with the local government. It was viewed as “Sutra and King” meaning that Sutra refers to the Teaching of the Buddha, and King refers to the government (back in those days, each area was a kingdom, ruled by a king). It was assumed that Buddhists got along with the king and the king, in turn, was kind to Buddhists. It is an acknowledgement that we live in this world together and cooperation was the best path.
Today, in America, this means to acknowledge the separation of church and state.
As for these times when politics are such a big part of our lives, yes, we should be engaged in politics.
We should encourage our leaders to follow the ideas of Buddhism. Mainly, this would mean, to follow a path of peace, to encourage harmony in society so that people are happy, and to care for the wellbeing of all living in our country/kingdom.
And when our leaders cannot follow the principles of Buddhism, we have the responsibility to change our leaders so that peace and harmony can guide our country and thus encourage the spread of Buddhism. Today, in America, it means to vote.
There is always danger when there are people who disagree with us. However, there are peaceful ways to confront those who disagree. If we choose a path of peacefulness and nonviolence, in the long run, we will prevail.
When there is violence and harm being done, we are obligated to stop the people doing the violence and harm in nonviolent ways. Today, in America, this could mean peaceful protest—not with rioting and rock throwing.
Gassho (with palms together), Rev. Ron